Tom Hanks is a third cousin four times removed to Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States.
Tom Hanks. He is a direct descendant of Nancy Hanks, Abraham Lincoln's mother
So yes there is still relatives of his alive
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Is there anyone that is still alive today that is related to abraham lincoln even by marriage?
Well, my cousin says that he's related to him but i can't remember how. So, i'm trying to see if my cousin is telling the truth. I know i could go online and find something about ancestry but that costs money so i'm just trying to do research so that i don't have to pay for anything but i haven't been able to find anything. Can someone help me?Is there anyone that is still alive today that is related to abraham lincoln even by marriage?
Tom Hanks is a third cousin four times removed to Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States.
Tom Hanks. He is a direct descendant of Nancy Hanks, Abraham Lincoln's mother
So yes there is still relatives of his alivenatural cleansing
Tom Hanks is a third cousin four times removed to Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States.
Tom Hanks. He is a direct descendant of Nancy Hanks, Abraham Lincoln's mother
So yes there is still relatives of his alive
Do you believe that Miss California lost the Miss USA pageant because of her stand on gay marriage?
No yes or no answers please explain. Easy 10 points for most interesting one.Do you believe that Miss California lost the Miss USA pageant because of her stand on gay marriage?
There are many other threads about this, all you gotta do is search for them.
But no, I honestly don't believe that is what caused her to lose. She was asked her opinion and she gave it, quite respectfully.Do you believe that Miss California lost the Miss USA pageant because of her stand on gay marriage?
No, I am gay but I don't think you could take her crown just because of what she thinks. I may not agree with what she said but no one has the right to get mad at someones opinion. I think Perez Hilton was really immature to leave a message like that. If he didn't agree with her that's Ok but he didn't have to call her a B****.
No I think she lost because that dirtbag Perez Hilton sabotaged her. She scored highest of all the contestants until he gave her a zero for her answer. If a person cannot keep their personal politics out of the mix they have no right to be a judge in ANY contest.
no, it is because one of her implants exploded under the bright, hot lights and hit a judge in the eye and the judge had to go to the hospital.
the video was edited out.
No, I think she lost because she showed that even though it was an old personal view she had a streak of ignorance which cluttered up the image of the MC within.
Probably. Contestants should be loving of ALL sorts of people and their choices, and clearly she wasn't.
No. She lost because she's an illiterate bimbo.
No, she lost it because the Hiton-prick was the judge.
I think so. That was such a negative thing to say! As Miss USA you're supposed to represent America. Personally I wouldn't want someone that negative representing this country. That's just not the ideal attitude of someone who would win the contest. It's a leadership role and in a leadership role many times you have to go against your beliefs in order to represent all people. You have to lead by example. I just can't see someone like that in such a leadership position. It was a huge blunder on her part. If that is her opinion than good for her but she definitely has to work on expressing things more positively especially when in view of the public eye.
(And I'm not just saying that because it was a statement against gay people. I would feel the same way if it were a statement against anybody. Or any other type of negative statement.)
There are many other threads about this, all you gotta do is search for them.
But no, I honestly don't believe that is what caused her to lose. She was asked her opinion and she gave it, quite respectfully.Do you believe that Miss California lost the Miss USA pageant because of her stand on gay marriage?
No, I am gay but I don't think you could take her crown just because of what she thinks. I may not agree with what she said but no one has the right to get mad at someones opinion. I think Perez Hilton was really immature to leave a message like that. If he didn't agree with her that's Ok but he didn't have to call her a B****.
No I think she lost because that dirtbag Perez Hilton sabotaged her. She scored highest of all the contestants until he gave her a zero for her answer. If a person cannot keep their personal politics out of the mix they have no right to be a judge in ANY contest.
no, it is because one of her implants exploded under the bright, hot lights and hit a judge in the eye and the judge had to go to the hospital.
the video was edited out.
No, I think she lost because she showed that even though it was an old personal view she had a streak of ignorance which cluttered up the image of the MC within.
Probably. Contestants should be loving of ALL sorts of people and their choices, and clearly she wasn't.
No. She lost because she's an illiterate bimbo.
No, she lost it because the Hiton-prick was the judge.
I think so. That was such a negative thing to say! As Miss USA you're supposed to represent America. Personally I wouldn't want someone that negative representing this country. That's just not the ideal attitude of someone who would win the contest. It's a leadership role and in a leadership role many times you have to go against your beliefs in order to represent all people. You have to lead by example. I just can't see someone like that in such a leadership position. It was a huge blunder on her part. If that is her opinion than good for her but she definitely has to work on expressing things more positively especially when in view of the public eye.
(And I'm not just saying that because it was a statement against gay people. I would feel the same way if it were a statement against anybody. Or any other type of negative statement.)
How come our politicians only bring up the gay marriage question around election time?
Bush did it twice, and he hasn't touched the subject again.How come our politicians only bring up the gay marriage question around election time?
Oh believe me, they bring it up all the time. Just ask them about Balancing the Budget, or the War in Iraq and it'll be...Oh look over there!! Two Gays Kissing!!! Aaaaahhh!!!
Sad.
Whooohooo for Captain Janeway!!!!!How come our politicians only bring up the gay marriage question around election time?
Bush did it because Karl Rove knew that same sex marriage is a hot button issue among the fundies and he told the pres to make it an issue. It was used to deflect the country's attention away from all the rights that are gradually being taken away from us.
Democrats and Republicans all do it for the same reason...everybody keeps falling for it. Whether you're for or against, it doesn't matter.
Because it is a divisive issue. Divide %26amp; Conquer is not just a military term, politicians use it during election seasons by saying ';If you are not 'for' us you must be 'against' us.';
Hot button issues such as same sex marriage %26amp; abortion are used to 'define' candidates during elections, but once they are elected they do not mention such things because they do not want to push any potential voter away.
The only reason I think Bush did was because he was digging for approval points. He wanted to be seen as a ';marriage defender'; to the heavy religious, and try to gain some support.
He did for a bit, but it didn't work as much as I bet he wanted it too.
People want answers finally.
It's pure, cynical politics. Because it's a hot button issue, it is trotted out to drum up votes.
fear. it's used to drum up votes from religious voters.
Oh believe me, they bring it up all the time. Just ask them about Balancing the Budget, or the War in Iraq and it'll be...Oh look over there!! Two Gays Kissing!!! Aaaaahhh!!!
Sad.
Whooohooo for Captain Janeway!!!!!How come our politicians only bring up the gay marriage question around election time?
Bush did it because Karl Rove knew that same sex marriage is a hot button issue among the fundies and he told the pres to make it an issue. It was used to deflect the country's attention away from all the rights that are gradually being taken away from us.
Democrats and Republicans all do it for the same reason...everybody keeps falling for it. Whether you're for or against, it doesn't matter.
Because it is a divisive issue. Divide %26amp; Conquer is not just a military term, politicians use it during election seasons by saying ';If you are not 'for' us you must be 'against' us.';
Hot button issues such as same sex marriage %26amp; abortion are used to 'define' candidates during elections, but once they are elected they do not mention such things because they do not want to push any potential voter away.
The only reason I think Bush did was because he was digging for approval points. He wanted to be seen as a ';marriage defender'; to the heavy religious, and try to gain some support.
He did for a bit, but it didn't work as much as I bet he wanted it too.
People want answers finally.
It's pure, cynical politics. Because it's a hot button issue, it is trotted out to drum up votes.
fear. it's used to drum up votes from religious voters.
Without using religion, The Bible, or Christianity in any way why are you against same sex marriage?
I've never heard a valid argument against it because it always goes back to religion. Without using religion, The Bible, or Christianity in any way why are you against same sex marriage?
As a matter of fact, marriage between one man and one woman has been practiced in every civilization, including those virtually untouched by Christianity and much older than Christianity. Why do you think the Chinese and Indians practice one-man-one-woman marriage?
While the man and the woman are prime beneficiaries of marriage (he is civilized, she is supported and protected), the chief beneficiaries of marriage are children. Unlike other species, human young take decades to mature. To learn the ways of the adult human world, with its specialized economics and complex relationships, children need a mother and father team to nurture, educate, and love them. Thus, humans have learned to honor this mother and father team with a special relationship, marriage.
The homosexual friendship of two men or two women has nothing to do with establishing a family and making sacrifices to care for potential children. For this reason, it is not marriage as practiced since prehistoric times, whatever a judge with a lively imagination wants to call it.
Where travesty marriage is enforced by law, real marriage invariably declines. For example, in Scandinavia (see link below), cohabitation has largely replaced marriage. As you can imagine, when cohabitating couples hit the inevitable rocky times, they separate, to the detriment of their children.
Cheers,
BruceWithout using religion, The Bible, or Christianity in any way why are you against same sex marriage?
I don't think you and I will EVER hear a decent argument against gay marriage that doesn't include references to Paul's writing or to Leviticus. And obviously, saying it is ';gross'; is not a valid argument. Thinking of some of my heterosexual friends and family members having sex grosses me out tremendously, yet they have every right to engage sexually as they please.
The constitution provides for equal treatment under the law. If someone chooses to deny gay and lesbian couples to marry in their church, they have every right to do so (my wife and I can't get married in a Catholic Church or a Muslim mosque). Denying two people in a loving relationship the opportunity to have their commitment recognized by the government is un-American.
In short, if someone is anti-gay because of religious beliefs, fine. Just don't use your beliefs to deny people equal rights. Peace.
Well, why doesn't ';domestic partners'; satisfy same sex couples?
Look up the state family code....domestic partners receive all the same benifits.
Marriage has already been taken as between a man and a woman.....biblical or not.
Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares that ';Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.';
I do not see this article say ';men and men or woman and woman of full age........';, etc.
Here are some good reasons I am against gay sex:
staph infection
fecal incontinence
rectal proplapse
anal fissures
Obviously, gay sex is not very healthy, especially for men.
So, without using religion, I don't want my children exposed to the idea that anything that is this unhealthy, and produces these kinds of health problems is ';normal'; or ';natural';.
That's why.
Actually, I see three different fundamental arguments against gay marriage:
1.) My god says it's bad.
2.) I think it's icky.
3.) That's the way we've always done it.
Of course, the second one isn't a reason to ban anything, or else anchovies would be illegal too. And the third - well, leaving out the fact that that's not actually how it's always been done (polygamy, interracial marriage, etc.), tradition is at best a starting point for an argument supported by other pieces of evidence.
Because without using religion, God says it's not good to put your privvates into another man's exit. Because without using religion, in the book of romans, it says a man's private shoudl not go inside another man's bum.
these people are rediculous. if you think being gay or having gay sex is gross, then guess what...you are probably straight! Have any of you ever met a gay person? Except for the frilly flamers they're actually nice, normal people. The heart wants what the heart wants and there is no god that could take away a person's free will (nor is there a god period).
its physically unnatural. man/woman relations are natural-for obvious reasons. there parts intertwine for obvious reasons. they also reproduce and further the human race. the very purpose of humans in large part. its purely scientific, all religion aside.
it goes against pro-creation. we have sex organs for a reason. not just for pleasure but to pro-create.
homosexuality is not a form of population control. birth control is.
its only religious reasons that i think homosexuality is sin, but its also religious thinking that i think stealing is sin. If you took God out of the picture then who has the right to say what is alright to do or not.
Do you know how many more weddings I would have to buy gifts for?
This economy sucks!
Deuce: Ban smoking then, it's much more hazzardous and it's dangerous to people who don't smoke.
Because it looks bad to see two men or two women kissing
or holding hand,s,,you know children ask questions and
to explain that to a child is hard,and it appalls me also.
Unhealthy, immoral, unnatural, un-reproductive, it un-defines marriage and it's sanctity.
That would depend on how one defines marriage, wouldn't it? If marriage is anything, it is nothing.
If homosexuals want to be as miserable as those who are already allowed to wed, then I think we should let them. They aren't hurting anybody.
Nicely done!!
And it gave Lady God and Deuce a great opportunity to display their ignorance.
A public service all round.
Most will have to appeal to yuck-factor ethics if they can't use their superstitious texts. (i.e. It's wrong because it makes me feel yucky!)
Because the entire state of California is not Disneyland.
EEEWWWWW!! Ickey!!!!!!
its spreads and promotes STD's
valid enough
it's pretty vulgar and unnatural. two pegs? two holes? it's kinda gross, dontcha think?
I am not against gay marriage. Not all Christians are.
You want to exclude religious answers from a question asked in R%26amp;S?
Well, you said it - take away religion and I'm not against it -- -- there.
No.
Because I.... uh.... hmph.
only if I'm not invited to the wedding
Because homosexuality is an unhealthy lifestyle that shortens the lives of those doing it.
***** Atheists!
As a matter of fact, marriage between one man and one woman has been practiced in every civilization, including those virtually untouched by Christianity and much older than Christianity. Why do you think the Chinese and Indians practice one-man-one-woman marriage?
While the man and the woman are prime beneficiaries of marriage (he is civilized, she is supported and protected), the chief beneficiaries of marriage are children. Unlike other species, human young take decades to mature. To learn the ways of the adult human world, with its specialized economics and complex relationships, children need a mother and father team to nurture, educate, and love them. Thus, humans have learned to honor this mother and father team with a special relationship, marriage.
The homosexual friendship of two men or two women has nothing to do with establishing a family and making sacrifices to care for potential children. For this reason, it is not marriage as practiced since prehistoric times, whatever a judge with a lively imagination wants to call it.
Where travesty marriage is enforced by law, real marriage invariably declines. For example, in Scandinavia (see link below), cohabitation has largely replaced marriage. As you can imagine, when cohabitating couples hit the inevitable rocky times, they separate, to the detriment of their children.
Cheers,
BruceWithout using religion, The Bible, or Christianity in any way why are you against same sex marriage?
I don't think you and I will EVER hear a decent argument against gay marriage that doesn't include references to Paul's writing or to Leviticus. And obviously, saying it is ';gross'; is not a valid argument. Thinking of some of my heterosexual friends and family members having sex grosses me out tremendously, yet they have every right to engage sexually as they please.
The constitution provides for equal treatment under the law. If someone chooses to deny gay and lesbian couples to marry in their church, they have every right to do so (my wife and I can't get married in a Catholic Church or a Muslim mosque). Denying two people in a loving relationship the opportunity to have their commitment recognized by the government is un-American.
In short, if someone is anti-gay because of religious beliefs, fine. Just don't use your beliefs to deny people equal rights. Peace.
Well, why doesn't ';domestic partners'; satisfy same sex couples?
Look up the state family code....domestic partners receive all the same benifits.
Marriage has already been taken as between a man and a woman.....biblical or not.
Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares that ';Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.';
I do not see this article say ';men and men or woman and woman of full age........';, etc.
Here are some good reasons I am against gay sex:
staph infection
fecal incontinence
rectal proplapse
anal fissures
Obviously, gay sex is not very healthy, especially for men.
So, without using religion, I don't want my children exposed to the idea that anything that is this unhealthy, and produces these kinds of health problems is ';normal'; or ';natural';.
That's why.
Actually, I see three different fundamental arguments against gay marriage:
1.) My god says it's bad.
2.) I think it's icky.
3.) That's the way we've always done it.
Of course, the second one isn't a reason to ban anything, or else anchovies would be illegal too. And the third - well, leaving out the fact that that's not actually how it's always been done (polygamy, interracial marriage, etc.), tradition is at best a starting point for an argument supported by other pieces of evidence.
Because without using religion, God says it's not good to put your privvates into another man's exit. Because without using religion, in the book of romans, it says a man's private shoudl not go inside another man's bum.
these people are rediculous. if you think being gay or having gay sex is gross, then guess what...you are probably straight! Have any of you ever met a gay person? Except for the frilly flamers they're actually nice, normal people. The heart wants what the heart wants and there is no god that could take away a person's free will (nor is there a god period).
its physically unnatural. man/woman relations are natural-for obvious reasons. there parts intertwine for obvious reasons. they also reproduce and further the human race. the very purpose of humans in large part. its purely scientific, all religion aside.
it goes against pro-creation. we have sex organs for a reason. not just for pleasure but to pro-create.
homosexuality is not a form of population control. birth control is.
its only religious reasons that i think homosexuality is sin, but its also religious thinking that i think stealing is sin. If you took God out of the picture then who has the right to say what is alright to do or not.
Do you know how many more weddings I would have to buy gifts for?
This economy sucks!
Deuce: Ban smoking then, it's much more hazzardous and it's dangerous to people who don't smoke.
Because it looks bad to see two men or two women kissing
or holding hand,s,,you know children ask questions and
to explain that to a child is hard,and it appalls me also.
Unhealthy, immoral, unnatural, un-reproductive, it un-defines marriage and it's sanctity.
That would depend on how one defines marriage, wouldn't it? If marriage is anything, it is nothing.
If homosexuals want to be as miserable as those who are already allowed to wed, then I think we should let them. They aren't hurting anybody.
Nicely done!!
And it gave Lady God and Deuce a great opportunity to display their ignorance.
A public service all round.
Most will have to appeal to yuck-factor ethics if they can't use their superstitious texts. (i.e. It's wrong because it makes me feel yucky!)
Because the entire state of California is not Disneyland.
EEEWWWWW!! Ickey!!!!!!
its spreads and promotes STD's
valid enough
it's pretty vulgar and unnatural. two pegs? two holes? it's kinda gross, dontcha think?
I am not against gay marriage. Not all Christians are.
You want to exclude religious answers from a question asked in R%26amp;S?
Well, you said it - take away religion and I'm not against it -- -- there.
No.
Because I.... uh.... hmph.
only if I'm not invited to the wedding
Because homosexuality is an unhealthy lifestyle that shortens the lives of those doing it.
***** Atheists!
Is a birthday party a good time to propose marriage?
Me and my girlfriend have been together a little over a year. We really love each other but we haven't discussed marriage yet and im really nervous about it. she is turning 10 next week and I think i might propose on her birthday. Is this a good idea?Is a birthday party a good time to propose marriage?
shes turning ten?Is a birthday party a good time to propose marriage?
What age? I hope there is a different age, anyhow, you should probably talk about it first because if she doesn't want to get married yet it may not be a good idea to just spring the ring on her.
Nice idea perfect even would definatly make her birthday memorable, go for it
good luck
10??
10??
This IS a typo...right??
Her 24th birthday would be a good one for the proposal. Not her 10th.
10??? no.......21....yes....I would propose to her after everyones left...and it's just the 2 of you.
shes turning ten?Is a birthday party a good time to propose marriage?
What age? I hope there is a different age, anyhow, you should probably talk about it first because if she doesn't want to get married yet it may not be a good idea to just spring the ring on her.
Nice idea perfect even would definatly make her birthday memorable, go for it
good luck
10??
10??
This IS a typo...right??
Her 24th birthday would be a good one for the proposal. Not her 10th.
10??? no.......21....yes....I would propose to her after everyones left...and it's just the 2 of you.
Why are the Jonas Brothers lying to themselves and claiming that they will stay virgins till marriage?
just wondering. i beleive that kevin is gunna keep that stupid purity ring promise, cuz, just look at him. But the other 2...very freakin doubtfull...you can just tell theres a dirty manwhore waiting to burst out..Why are the Jonas Brothers lying to themselves and claiming that they will stay virgins till marriage?
Kevin is lieing yo us all
the little jonas and other jonas aren't probally...maybe ...i dont know
kevin is like 21 if he doesn't do it soon hell end up as a pervet of a pedo or hel'l end up divoceing his future wife cause of him pent up desires and start buliding a porn stash
its natrual to have disires and there nothing wrong with sex ( i mean meaning full stuff not i was drunk and pissed) before marrage as long
as your comfortable with it and your not a slut Why are the Jonas Brothers lying to themselves and claiming that they will stay virgins till marriage?
There are a lot of good looking people that stay virgins until they are married. It is possible to do, if you really want to do it
I think it's a good thing that the Jonas Brothers, Miley cryus and other Disney star kids are doing this. It show some teenager and people in their early 20's think sex is an important step
even if they do not keep it, it's a good message
They may be ';dirty manwhores'; but they are Disney Corp. ';dirty manwhores'; spreading the Disney company line.
This is a marketed boy band whose limited minimal talents are over hyped by very professional skilled handlers.
Everything they say, do, think, sing or represent has been cultivated and conceived in a marketing scheme created before their first performance by individuals who understand what sells. The group has all the originality and spontanaity of MILLI VANILLI with even less native talent.
they do it because their rep tells them to. it makes them seem more unattainable to young girls. this ups their sales. it also makes parents want to buy the albums for their kids since they are ';such a good influence'; (which also ups sales). it's just a publicity stunt. i think you knew that though... i think you just find it kind of annoying that they are doing the britney spears thing. you'd be right about this... it has been done before, and it is incredibly annoying.
Who f****g cares!! I'm going crazy because I see their name everywhere!! Can I go for one day without hearing of them. All of you fans should make a new website where all of the Jonas fans can continue breathing and screaming their names, and asking the wildest questions of their immatured imagination and STOP PLAGUING THIS SITE with obsessiveness and nonsense!!
What's so wrong about staying pure? I am. (I made this decision before I ever knew about JB). They are a good example to the younger generations, and it's just what we need right now. They have good morals, will power, and wonderful parents to keep them grounded. We need more people with morals like that in the world.
That is true but they are teenage boys, what do you excpect? and I'm pretty sure they will keep there promise, because it's not a promise to themselves. It's a promise to God, and religion is very important to them ^^
:0 omg for one you dont no them and dont judge them
i belive that they will keep there promise because 1. they will keep the promise to themselves and 2. its in the press now so if they do they will look stupid
ilovetheJONASBROTHERS %26lt;3 x
Not everyone is immoral, I guess. The Osmonds all stayed pure, and if you were around to see that, then you'd understand that there actually are people out there who make commitments and then don't break them.
Not everyone is corrupt!
theyre not lying to themselves. theyre lying to the public.
totally different and MUCH more acceptable. :)
Because they are Disney Channel's little boys and don't want to do anything to upset the people that they sold out to and basically made them the most pathetic band ever.
I really respect the decision! I think they will wait til marriage and its about time that hollywood has someone to look up to!
I'm 18 and i'm a VIRGIN and WAITING TIL MARRIAGE!
Lol, yes kevin will there is no doubt about that. However nick and joe get so much attention its only a matter of time before they lose it, if they havent already.
Maybe they will. Don't judge everyone by yourself.
They may have willpower %26amp; be able to control their urges which is something sadly lacking these days.
They aren't lying to themselves they are lying to you.
they're just like any other teenager out there. say they'll keep promises but, who knows if they'll keep them. no one can say for sure.
It is an honorable thing to even attempt.
Maybe there will be a few people left in that generation that will not be riddled with STD's.
I pray that more people follow their example.
Jealous because you aren't a virgin??
They arn't lying to themselves. They will. + if they dont, who cares?
wanna do the britney because girls totally dig the virgin dudes
Lol, this made me laugh. But I do think they will keep their promises. But that's just me. I could be wrong......
Yes.
for their image
they dress so ugly
they are true fashion victims
i agreee. kevin will make it and mebe jo too but im pretty sure not nick
Kevin is lieing yo us all
the little jonas and other jonas aren't probally...maybe ...i dont know
kevin is like 21 if he doesn't do it soon hell end up as a pervet of a pedo or hel'l end up divoceing his future wife cause of him pent up desires and start buliding a porn stash
its natrual to have disires and there nothing wrong with sex ( i mean meaning full stuff not i was drunk and pissed) before marrage as long
as your comfortable with it and your not a slut Why are the Jonas Brothers lying to themselves and claiming that they will stay virgins till marriage?
There are a lot of good looking people that stay virgins until they are married. It is possible to do, if you really want to do it
I think it's a good thing that the Jonas Brothers, Miley cryus and other Disney star kids are doing this. It show some teenager and people in their early 20's think sex is an important step
even if they do not keep it, it's a good message
They may be ';dirty manwhores'; but they are Disney Corp. ';dirty manwhores'; spreading the Disney company line.
This is a marketed boy band whose limited minimal talents are over hyped by very professional skilled handlers.
Everything they say, do, think, sing or represent has been cultivated and conceived in a marketing scheme created before their first performance by individuals who understand what sells. The group has all the originality and spontanaity of MILLI VANILLI with even less native talent.
they do it because their rep tells them to. it makes them seem more unattainable to young girls. this ups their sales. it also makes parents want to buy the albums for their kids since they are ';such a good influence'; (which also ups sales). it's just a publicity stunt. i think you knew that though... i think you just find it kind of annoying that they are doing the britney spears thing. you'd be right about this... it has been done before, and it is incredibly annoying.
Who f****g cares!! I'm going crazy because I see their name everywhere!! Can I go for one day without hearing of them. All of you fans should make a new website where all of the Jonas fans can continue breathing and screaming their names, and asking the wildest questions of their immatured imagination and STOP PLAGUING THIS SITE with obsessiveness and nonsense!!
What's so wrong about staying pure? I am. (I made this decision before I ever knew about JB). They are a good example to the younger generations, and it's just what we need right now. They have good morals, will power, and wonderful parents to keep them grounded. We need more people with morals like that in the world.
That is true but they are teenage boys, what do you excpect? and I'm pretty sure they will keep there promise, because it's not a promise to themselves. It's a promise to God, and religion is very important to them ^^
:0 omg for one you dont no them and dont judge them
i belive that they will keep there promise because 1. they will keep the promise to themselves and 2. its in the press now so if they do they will look stupid
ilovetheJONASBROTHERS %26lt;3 x
Not everyone is immoral, I guess. The Osmonds all stayed pure, and if you were around to see that, then you'd understand that there actually are people out there who make commitments and then don't break them.
Not everyone is corrupt!
theyre not lying to themselves. theyre lying to the public.
totally different and MUCH more acceptable. :)
Because they are Disney Channel's little boys and don't want to do anything to upset the people that they sold out to and basically made them the most pathetic band ever.
I really respect the decision! I think they will wait til marriage and its about time that hollywood has someone to look up to!
I'm 18 and i'm a VIRGIN and WAITING TIL MARRIAGE!
Lol, yes kevin will there is no doubt about that. However nick and joe get so much attention its only a matter of time before they lose it, if they havent already.
Maybe they will. Don't judge everyone by yourself.
They may have willpower %26amp; be able to control their urges which is something sadly lacking these days.
They aren't lying to themselves they are lying to you.
they're just like any other teenager out there. say they'll keep promises but, who knows if they'll keep them. no one can say for sure.
It is an honorable thing to even attempt.
Maybe there will be a few people left in that generation that will not be riddled with STD's.
I pray that more people follow their example.
Jealous because you aren't a virgin??
They arn't lying to themselves. They will. + if they dont, who cares?
wanna do the britney because girls totally dig the virgin dudes
Lol, this made me laugh. But I do think they will keep their promises. But that's just me. I could be wrong......
Yes.
for their image
they dress so ugly
they are true fashion victims
i agreee. kevin will make it and mebe jo too but im pretty sure not nick
Monday, December 28, 2009
Who should i contact if i dont remember my marriage date?
I got married about 3 years ago, but shortly thereafter, my wife disappeared and I do not know anything more about her. Now I am trying to request my marriage certificate to file for divorce and I dont remember the date we got married.Who should i contact if i dont remember my marriage date?
A divorce attorney then a shrink.Who should i contact if i dont remember my marriage date?
Well just because I dont remember the date of my marriage doesnt mean I need a shrink. I remember the year and month, I just dont remember the day. So for all you smart remarkers, please get a life.
forgot the date of your marriage!!!!
Even after going through a very bad divorce which happened 8 years ago, I still remember the date of my illfated marriage.
Have your head checked!!!!
look at your marriage photos, that might give a clue to your lost memory.
good luck
Get them to do a search for the full year, they should be able to find it if you have the exact year you married.
You have bigger issues if you don't remember where you got married.
lulznatural cleansing
A divorce attorney then a shrink.Who should i contact if i dont remember my marriage date?
Well just because I dont remember the date of my marriage doesnt mean I need a shrink. I remember the year and month, I just dont remember the day. So for all you smart remarkers, please get a life.
Report Abuse
forgot the date of your marriage!!!!
Even after going through a very bad divorce which happened 8 years ago, I still remember the date of my illfated marriage.
Have your head checked!!!!
look at your marriage photos, that might give a clue to your lost memory.
good luck
Get them to do a search for the full year, they should be able to find it if you have the exact year you married.
You have bigger issues if you don't remember where you got married.
lulz
How cristian girl and hindu guy can get legal marriage?
Is this legal if wedding held under Hindu marriage act ?How cristian girl and hindu guy can get legal marriage?
it will be absolutely legal as far as hindu marriage act you have nothing to worry.The Intercaste marriage in Hindus are common and so far both of you are above 18 the marriage has the legal sanction.How cristian girl and hindu guy can get legal marriage?
Should register according to Civil Marriage provisions.
What do you have in common besides sex is what I would be wondering? Two different worlds folks?
it will be absolutely legal as far as hindu marriage act you have nothing to worry.The Intercaste marriage in Hindus are common and so far both of you are above 18 the marriage has the legal sanction.How cristian girl and hindu guy can get legal marriage?
Should register according to Civil Marriage provisions.
What do you have in common besides sex is what I would be wondering? Two different worlds folks?
Would you read a novel about an extremely dysfunctional marriage?
A marriage marred by infidelity, abuse, alcohol and drugs?Would you read a novel about an extremely dysfunctional marriage?
the best books usually have one or some of the above.Would you read a novel about an extremely dysfunctional marriage?
No.
I read to get away from the world.
I don't want my ';escape'; to a dysfunctional nightmare.
Some people might enjoy it. Maybe victims who need the strength to get out -- if it has a happy ending.
Is this a novel, biography, or documentary or something else?
SURE, i would. it might give me an insight as to how to avoid relationships that could turn out to be dysfunctional . what is the title of the book?
No, I don't read novels, and if I did they wouldn't be about depressing issues such as infedelity and abuse.
Depends on the novel, but generally I prefer non-fiction.
I read Anna Karenina, does this count?
It would be just like reading my own autobiography
The book slummy mommy is like that. As long as theres a happy ending I would.
Probably wouldn't read it. I could write it though.
read it! im liv'n it!
That just doesn't sound all that interesting.
it be interesting to just know what not to do and to what fix
probably would does it end on a good note
the best books usually have one or some of the above.Would you read a novel about an extremely dysfunctional marriage?
No.
I read to get away from the world.
I don't want my ';escape'; to a dysfunctional nightmare.
Some people might enjoy it. Maybe victims who need the strength to get out -- if it has a happy ending.
Is this a novel, biography, or documentary or something else?
SURE, i would. it might give me an insight as to how to avoid relationships that could turn out to be dysfunctional . what is the title of the book?
No, I don't read novels, and if I did they wouldn't be about depressing issues such as infedelity and abuse.
Depends on the novel, but generally I prefer non-fiction.
I read Anna Karenina, does this count?
It would be just like reading my own autobiography
The book slummy mommy is like that. As long as theres a happy ending I would.
Probably wouldn't read it. I could write it though.
read it! im liv'n it!
That just doesn't sound all that interesting.
it be interesting to just know what not to do and to what fix
probably would does it end on a good note
What is the normal amount for paying minister for marriage ceremony?
The honorarium can be as little or as much as you wish. If you are a member of the church then more than likely you aren't obligated to pay anything. My brother is a pastor (Methodist) of a mid-sized church and he receives any where from $100 - $300 per wedding. You have to consider that he meets with the couple several times for counseling, planning etc.. and this is generally done in the evenings or Saturdays - time that he could be spending with his wife and kids. He will also be giving up an evening for your rehearsal and most if not all of a day for your wedding.
It's up to you how much you chose to give. You can always call the church secretary and ask what is commonly given for weddings.What is the normal amount for paying minister for marriage ceremony?
I'm paying my pastor $150, plus materials for the premarital class. Just ask if you don't know. I asked mine.What is the normal amount for paying minister for marriage ceremony?
Most will ask for a donation to the church. I've heard of between $100 to $300.
I don't think you have to pay the minister.
It's up to you how much you chose to give. You can always call the church secretary and ask what is commonly given for weddings.What is the normal amount for paying minister for marriage ceremony?
I'm paying my pastor $150, plus materials for the premarital class. Just ask if you don't know. I asked mine.What is the normal amount for paying minister for marriage ceremony?
Most will ask for a donation to the church. I've heard of between $100 to $300.
I don't think you have to pay the minister.
Would you read a novel about an extremely dysfunctional marriage?
A marriage marred by infidelity, abuse, alcohol and drugs?Would you read a novel about an extremely dysfunctional marriage?
It depends...if there's a happy ending I probably would.Would you read a novel about an extremely dysfunctional marriage?
No. I can get that from listening to any one of my co-workers, neighbbors, sisters or brothers, or any television show, or any newspaper.
When I read a book, I'm looking for distraction, provoking of deep thought, or entertainment.
Not more of the stuff I see every day in real life.
No way, sounds like my mothers three marriages, I don't need any flashbacks.
Possibly, it would depend on the plot.
NOPE !
It depends...if there's a happy ending I probably would.Would you read a novel about an extremely dysfunctional marriage?
No. I can get that from listening to any one of my co-workers, neighbbors, sisters or brothers, or any television show, or any newspaper.
When I read a book, I'm looking for distraction, provoking of deep thought, or entertainment.
Not more of the stuff I see every day in real life.
No way, sounds like my mothers three marriages, I don't need any flashbacks.
Possibly, it would depend on the plot.
NOPE !
Why are the Jonas Brothers lying to themselves and claiming that they will stay virgins till marriage?
just wondering. i beleive that kevin is gunna keep that stupid purity ring promise, cuz, just look at him. But the other 2...very freakin doubtfull...you can just tell theres a dirty manwhore waiting to burst out..Why are the Jonas Brothers lying to themselves and claiming that they will stay virgins till marriage?
Kevin is lieing yo us all
the little jonas and other jonas aren't probally...maybe ...i dont know
kevin is like 21 if he doesn't do it soon hell end up as a pervet of a pedo or hel'l end up divoceing his future wife cause of him pent up desires and start buliding a porn stash
its natrual to have disires and there nothing wrong with sex ( i mean meaning full stuff not i was drunk and pissed) before marrage as long
as your comfortable with it and your not a **** Why are the Jonas Brothers lying to themselves and claiming that they will stay virgins till marriage?
There are a lot of good looking people that stay virgins until they are married. It is possible to do, if you really want to do it
I think it's a good thing that the Jonas Brothers, Miley cryus and other Disney star kids are doing this. It show some teenager and people in their early 20's think sex is an important step
even if they do not keep it, it's a good message
They may be ';dirty manwhores'; but they are Disney Corp. ';dirty manwhores'; spreading the Disney company line.
This is a marketed boy band whose limited minimal talents are over hyped by very professional skilled handlers.
Everything they say, do, think, sing or represent has been cultivated and conceived in a marketing scheme created before their first performance by individuals who understand what sells. The group has all the originality and spontanaity of MILLI VANILLI with even less native talent.
they do it because their rep tells them to. it makes them seem more unattainable to young girls. this ups their sales. it also makes parents want to buy the albums for their kids since they are ';such a good influence'; (which also ups sales). it's just a publicity stunt. i think you knew that though... i think you just find it kind of annoying that they are doing the britney spears thing. you'd be right about this... it has been done before, and it is incredibly annoying.
Who f****g cares!! I'm going crazy because I see their name everywhere!! Can I go for one day without hearing of them. All of you fans should make a new website where all of the Jonas fans can continue breathing and screaming their names, and asking the wildest questions of their immatured imagination and STOP PLAGUING THIS SITE with obsessiveness and nonsense!!
What's so wrong about staying pure? I am. (I made this decision before I ever knew about JB). They are a good example to the younger generations, and it's just what we need right now. They have good morals, will power, and wonderful parents to keep them grounded. We need more people with morals like that in the world.
That is true but they are teenage boys, what do you excpect? and I'm pretty sure they will keep there promise, because it's not a promise to themselves. It's a promise to God, and religion is very important to them ^^
:0 omg for one you dont no them and dont judge them
i belive that they will keep there promise because 1. they will keep the promise to themselves and 2. its in the press now so if they do they will look stupid
ilovetheJONASBROTHERS %26lt;3 x
Not everyone is immoral, I guess. The Osmonds all stayed pure, and if you were around to see that, then you'd understand that there actually are people out there who make commitments and then don't break them.
Not everyone is corrupt!
theyre not lying to themselves. theyre lying to the public.
totally different and MUCH more acceptable. :)
Because they are Disney Channel's little boys and don't want to do anything to upset the people that they sold out to and basically made them the most pathetic band ever.
I really respect the decision! I think they will wait til marriage and its about time that hollywood has someone to look up to!
I'm 18 and i'm a VIRGIN and WAITING TIL MARRIAGE!
Lol, yes kevin will there is no doubt about that. However nick and joe get so much attention its only a matter of time before they lose it, if they havent already.
Maybe they will. Don't judge everyone by yourself.
They may have willpower %26amp; be able to control their urges which is something sadly lacking these days.
They aren't lying to themselves they are lying to you.
they're just like any other teenager out there. say they'll keep promises but, who knows if they'll keep them. no one can say for sure.
It is an honorable thing to even attempt.
Maybe there will be a few people left in that generation that will not be riddled with STD's.
I pray that more people follow their example.
Jealous because you aren't a virgin??
They arn't lying to themselves. They will. + if they dont, who cares?
wanna do the britney because girls totally dig the virgin dudes
Lol, this made me laugh. But I do think they will keep their promises. But that's just me. I could be wrong......
Yes.
for their image
they dress so ugly
they are true fashion victims
i agreee. kevin will make it and mebe jo too but im pretty sure not nick
Kevin is lieing yo us all
the little jonas and other jonas aren't probally...maybe ...i dont know
kevin is like 21 if he doesn't do it soon hell end up as a pervet of a pedo or hel'l end up divoceing his future wife cause of him pent up desires and start buliding a porn stash
its natrual to have disires and there nothing wrong with sex ( i mean meaning full stuff not i was drunk and pissed) before marrage as long
as your comfortable with it and your not a **** Why are the Jonas Brothers lying to themselves and claiming that they will stay virgins till marriage?
There are a lot of good looking people that stay virgins until they are married. It is possible to do, if you really want to do it
I think it's a good thing that the Jonas Brothers, Miley cryus and other Disney star kids are doing this. It show some teenager and people in their early 20's think sex is an important step
even if they do not keep it, it's a good message
They may be ';dirty manwhores'; but they are Disney Corp. ';dirty manwhores'; spreading the Disney company line.
This is a marketed boy band whose limited minimal talents are over hyped by very professional skilled handlers.
Everything they say, do, think, sing or represent has been cultivated and conceived in a marketing scheme created before their first performance by individuals who understand what sells. The group has all the originality and spontanaity of MILLI VANILLI with even less native talent.
they do it because their rep tells them to. it makes them seem more unattainable to young girls. this ups their sales. it also makes parents want to buy the albums for their kids since they are ';such a good influence'; (which also ups sales). it's just a publicity stunt. i think you knew that though... i think you just find it kind of annoying that they are doing the britney spears thing. you'd be right about this... it has been done before, and it is incredibly annoying.
Who f****g cares!! I'm going crazy because I see their name everywhere!! Can I go for one day without hearing of them. All of you fans should make a new website where all of the Jonas fans can continue breathing and screaming their names, and asking the wildest questions of their immatured imagination and STOP PLAGUING THIS SITE with obsessiveness and nonsense!!
What's so wrong about staying pure? I am. (I made this decision before I ever knew about JB). They are a good example to the younger generations, and it's just what we need right now. They have good morals, will power, and wonderful parents to keep them grounded. We need more people with morals like that in the world.
That is true but they are teenage boys, what do you excpect? and I'm pretty sure they will keep there promise, because it's not a promise to themselves. It's a promise to God, and religion is very important to them ^^
:0 omg for one you dont no them and dont judge them
i belive that they will keep there promise because 1. they will keep the promise to themselves and 2. its in the press now so if they do they will look stupid
ilovetheJONASBROTHERS %26lt;3 x
Not everyone is immoral, I guess. The Osmonds all stayed pure, and if you were around to see that, then you'd understand that there actually are people out there who make commitments and then don't break them.
Not everyone is corrupt!
theyre not lying to themselves. theyre lying to the public.
totally different and MUCH more acceptable. :)
Because they are Disney Channel's little boys and don't want to do anything to upset the people that they sold out to and basically made them the most pathetic band ever.
I really respect the decision! I think they will wait til marriage and its about time that hollywood has someone to look up to!
I'm 18 and i'm a VIRGIN and WAITING TIL MARRIAGE!
Lol, yes kevin will there is no doubt about that. However nick and joe get so much attention its only a matter of time before they lose it, if they havent already.
Maybe they will. Don't judge everyone by yourself.
They may have willpower %26amp; be able to control their urges which is something sadly lacking these days.
They aren't lying to themselves they are lying to you.
they're just like any other teenager out there. say they'll keep promises but, who knows if they'll keep them. no one can say for sure.
It is an honorable thing to even attempt.
Maybe there will be a few people left in that generation that will not be riddled with STD's.
I pray that more people follow their example.
Jealous because you aren't a virgin??
They arn't lying to themselves. They will. + if they dont, who cares?
wanna do the britney because girls totally dig the virgin dudes
Lol, this made me laugh. But I do think they will keep their promises. But that's just me. I could be wrong......
Yes.
for their image
they dress so ugly
they are true fashion victims
i agreee. kevin will make it and mebe jo too but im pretty sure not nick
Friday, December 25, 2009
Could matters like abortion, the death penalty, or gay marriage be resolved with Constitutional amendments?
In theory, Could Constitutional amendments be passed that say there can never be a legal abortion in the USA? Or that capital punishment is illegal everywhere in the USA? Or that gay people can or cannot marry one an other?
Can the Constitutional amendment process do this?Could matters like abortion, the death penalty, or gay marriage be resolved with Constitutional amendments?
Yes, but it won't happen because a constitutional amendment requires more then a simple majority.Could matters like abortion, the death penalty, or gay marriage be resolved with Constitutional amendments?
Yes they can, but it's not easy to get a constitutional amendment passed, it takes approval by 2/3 of the states.
During his campaign in 1980 Ronald Reagan promised to propose a constitutional amendment declaring the pre-born as -human- so abortion would be murder. Once in office he didn't even try.
A better way to resolve an issue like this is with a Supreme Court decision. The Supreme Court decided that laws against miscegenation were illegal and that was that. They made the same decision about 'sodomy' for gays. And, for that matter, abortion.
Capital punishment was once seen to be 'cruel and unusual punishment', and I think will be again in the not-too-distant future. Gay marriage is part of the 14th Amendment, equal rights under the law. And abortion is seen as a private matter. It would take a constitutional amendment to change them, but they are so unlikely they haven't even ever been tried.
Though it would be difficult, yes, all three could theoretically be resolved through Constitutional amendments. That said, if you support the strength of the Constitution and recognize it as the ultimate doctrine of law within the United States, then you should also recognize that just like hundreds of other issues, the death penalty, gay marriage and abortion are not issues to be dealt with by the federal government. The United States is a nation based on Federalism, meaning that while some rights and powers are delegated exclusively to the federal government (the power to go to war or make treaties, for example), there are few powers (particularly powers concerning social issues such as these) that are not given to the state. A future Constitutional amendment addressing one or all of these issues is not impossible, but a Supreme Court ruling is far more likely. In either case, it will simply be another example of the federal government overstepping its rights and infringing upon the rights of the states provided for in our Constitution.
Yes there could. The only problem is with contradictions within the constitution.
The supreme court says that the abortion is protected through the right to privacy. You make an amendment banning abortion, then how does the right to privacy fit into the constitution?
The death penalty is probably easier to ban. Would there be enough states to support this though.
Banning gay marriage would be a complete morally backwards turn. How can you say the things in the constitution that all people are equal and make a law making people not equal? Does america want a constitution that does not work?
A constitutional amendment can do anything. They banned the drinking of alcohol. And then unbanned it.
Absolutely, but abortion rights activists, gay rights activists, and death penalty abolitionists KNOW that those positions would never be successful in amending the US Constitution, so they try to use the back door and have courts invent rights to fit their agenda.
whale
Its that guy-
There are two ways to void bad decisions by the USSC, through the use of an Amendment and by overturning the decision by a future court, as the court did in Brown v Board of Education in turning over the Democratic idea of ';Separate but Equal'; in Plessey v Fergusson.
There is no right to privacy in the USC and the death penalty IS written into the USC, so only the process was restricted, not the death penalty itself, learn a little about history and the law before making your bad answers next time.
Yes, if there are enough votes to pass it.
But remember, just like Prohibition, if it can be done, it can be undone.
Prop 8 was an amendment to the California State Constitution. It passed, but is now being challenged in the court system.
One could try to pass a constitutional amendment for nearly anything. Good luck with that.
The reason anti abortion activists never want the issue brought to a vote is because they know the majority of Americans would vote against them.
Yes, it's possible, just like it would be possible to reinstate slavery through a constitutional amendment.
Whether that will actually happen is a different story.
Leave it to the statesnatural cleansing
Can the Constitutional amendment process do this?Could matters like abortion, the death penalty, or gay marriage be resolved with Constitutional amendments?
Yes, but it won't happen because a constitutional amendment requires more then a simple majority.Could matters like abortion, the death penalty, or gay marriage be resolved with Constitutional amendments?
Yes they can, but it's not easy to get a constitutional amendment passed, it takes approval by 2/3 of the states.
During his campaign in 1980 Ronald Reagan promised to propose a constitutional amendment declaring the pre-born as -human- so abortion would be murder. Once in office he didn't even try.
A better way to resolve an issue like this is with a Supreme Court decision. The Supreme Court decided that laws against miscegenation were illegal and that was that. They made the same decision about 'sodomy' for gays. And, for that matter, abortion.
Capital punishment was once seen to be 'cruel and unusual punishment', and I think will be again in the not-too-distant future. Gay marriage is part of the 14th Amendment, equal rights under the law. And abortion is seen as a private matter. It would take a constitutional amendment to change them, but they are so unlikely they haven't even ever been tried.
Though it would be difficult, yes, all three could theoretically be resolved through Constitutional amendments. That said, if you support the strength of the Constitution and recognize it as the ultimate doctrine of law within the United States, then you should also recognize that just like hundreds of other issues, the death penalty, gay marriage and abortion are not issues to be dealt with by the federal government. The United States is a nation based on Federalism, meaning that while some rights and powers are delegated exclusively to the federal government (the power to go to war or make treaties, for example), there are few powers (particularly powers concerning social issues such as these) that are not given to the state. A future Constitutional amendment addressing one or all of these issues is not impossible, but a Supreme Court ruling is far more likely. In either case, it will simply be another example of the federal government overstepping its rights and infringing upon the rights of the states provided for in our Constitution.
Yes there could. The only problem is with contradictions within the constitution.
The supreme court says that the abortion is protected through the right to privacy. You make an amendment banning abortion, then how does the right to privacy fit into the constitution?
The death penalty is probably easier to ban. Would there be enough states to support this though.
Banning gay marriage would be a complete morally backwards turn. How can you say the things in the constitution that all people are equal and make a law making people not equal? Does america want a constitution that does not work?
A constitutional amendment can do anything. They banned the drinking of alcohol. And then unbanned it.
Absolutely, but abortion rights activists, gay rights activists, and death penalty abolitionists KNOW that those positions would never be successful in amending the US Constitution, so they try to use the back door and have courts invent rights to fit their agenda.
whale
Its that guy-
There are two ways to void bad decisions by the USSC, through the use of an Amendment and by overturning the decision by a future court, as the court did in Brown v Board of Education in turning over the Democratic idea of ';Separate but Equal'; in Plessey v Fergusson.
There is no right to privacy in the USC and the death penalty IS written into the USC, so only the process was restricted, not the death penalty itself, learn a little about history and the law before making your bad answers next time.
Yes, if there are enough votes to pass it.
But remember, just like Prohibition, if it can be done, it can be undone.
Prop 8 was an amendment to the California State Constitution. It passed, but is now being challenged in the court system.
One could try to pass a constitutional amendment for nearly anything. Good luck with that.
The reason anti abortion activists never want the issue brought to a vote is because they know the majority of Americans would vote against them.
Yes, it's possible, just like it would be possible to reinstate slavery through a constitutional amendment.
Whether that will actually happen is a different story.
Leave it to the states
If gays are equal under the law thus allowed marriage, why are they protected under hate crime laws?
Anyone else watching C-span and the hate crime legislation? It just seems like a double standard.If gays are equal under the law thus allowed marriage, why are they protected under hate crime laws?
exactly.
'hate' crime laws are a ludicrous attempt to legislate someone's THOUGHTS.
talk about the ULTIMATE breach of the right to free speech!!If gays are equal under the law thus allowed marriage, why are they protected under hate crime laws?
All crimes committed involve hatred. So what's the difference between the two? Is murder of a white heterosexual man any different than the murder of a white homosexual one? The same rule applies if they are asian, black, indian, christian, muslim. Should the prosecutor really care what your sexual preference is? Isn't murder the same in both cases?
Because hate crime laws are national, and remember only 3 or 4 states allow gays to marry. Plus there are still violent crimes against gays all over the country occurring for 1 reason, they are gay. People seem to hate them for that reason only.
Yep, just like those horrible ';double-standards'; that women, racial minorities, and religions take advantage of. After all, once these groups were ';allowed under law';, all discrimination stopped, right?
They are still a minority. The same reason blacks are protected under hate crime laws but equal under the law.
Equal under the law does not equal not discriminated against
...you do know heterosexuals are protected under hate crimes as well.
Sexual orientation includes heterosexuality.
Dismissed.
Liberal Hypocrisy.
because as a group, they have been specifically targeted
Because they want it all!
possibly because of people like your good self?
exactly.
'hate' crime laws are a ludicrous attempt to legislate someone's THOUGHTS.
talk about the ULTIMATE breach of the right to free speech!!If gays are equal under the law thus allowed marriage, why are they protected under hate crime laws?
All crimes committed involve hatred. So what's the difference between the two? Is murder of a white heterosexual man any different than the murder of a white homosexual one? The same rule applies if they are asian, black, indian, christian, muslim. Should the prosecutor really care what your sexual preference is? Isn't murder the same in both cases?
Because hate crime laws are national, and remember only 3 or 4 states allow gays to marry. Plus there are still violent crimes against gays all over the country occurring for 1 reason, they are gay. People seem to hate them for that reason only.
Yep, just like those horrible ';double-standards'; that women, racial minorities, and religions take advantage of. After all, once these groups were ';allowed under law';, all discrimination stopped, right?
They are still a minority. The same reason blacks are protected under hate crime laws but equal under the law.
Equal under the law does not equal not discriminated against
...you do know heterosexuals are protected under hate crimes as well.
Sexual orientation includes heterosexuality.
Dismissed.
Liberal Hypocrisy.
because as a group, they have been specifically targeted
Because they want it all!
possibly because of people like your good self?
Where can I find info about IL common law marriage rights?
Does a person who has contributed monies toward mortage, household repairs and remodeling, etc. etc. have any monetary rights if the couple split after 15 years?Where can I find info about IL common law marriage rights?
+ The State District Attorney's web site may have a link and the State Legislation's law library will definitely have information.Where can I find info about IL common law marriage rights?
Illinois is not one of the states which recognizes common law marriage. Thus, to become married in the state of Illinois, one has to obtain a marriage license, etc.
In some cases, an illinois court *might* recognize a common law marriage which had been formed in a state which does recognize them.
This is one of the problems with living together without the benefit of marriage. The rights of the partners to the equity in the house, for instance, will not be the same as if there was a valid marriage.
Without knowing more about the situtation, I can't answer your question. I strongly suggest that you (or the person who contributed to mortgage, etc) consult with an attorney licensed in Illinois. For a referral, contact your local or state bar association.
+ The State District Attorney's web site may have a link and the State Legislation's law library will definitely have information.Where can I find info about IL common law marriage rights?
Illinois is not one of the states which recognizes common law marriage. Thus, to become married in the state of Illinois, one has to obtain a marriage license, etc.
In some cases, an illinois court *might* recognize a common law marriage which had been formed in a state which does recognize them.
This is one of the problems with living together without the benefit of marriage. The rights of the partners to the equity in the house, for instance, will not be the same as if there was a valid marriage.
Without knowing more about the situtation, I can't answer your question. I strongly suggest that you (or the person who contributed to mortgage, etc) consult with an attorney licensed in Illinois. For a referral, contact your local or state bar association.
Can forgetting one letter in a word ruin a marriage? While on a business holiday I sent my wife a postcard?
with the words: ';Having a great time. Wish you were her.'; on the back of it.Can forgetting one letter in a word ruin a marriage? While on a business holiday I sent my wife a postcard?
Ouch....I'd wear a cup if I were you.Can forgetting one letter in a word ruin a marriage? While on a business holiday I sent my wife a postcard?
i guess it depends on the girl. i would hope your relationship is stronger then that.
for me, i wouldn't take that personally, cause my fiance writes fast, sloppy, and has a tendency to forget letters. so i wouldn't think anything of it.
did she say something about it? if she trusts you, she shouldn't be worrying about it...
good luck!
Well maybe next time you write, instead of a postcard you can send her a letter. Get it? Send her the missing ';e';? Thank you. Good night!
Very Freudian. Bet your wife isn't laughing. Better send a floral arrangement with a note on the card, ';Oops, looks like I missed a vowel in my last postcard, and I'm still missing ';U';! ';
Nice work! If your wife is the jealous type you might be screwed for awhile. If your wife is self assured in your relationship she just might get over it. She may never let you forget it though.
an innocent oversight dude ...don;t fold under pressure,could scar the relationship for life,,lol
LOL. Business holiday?!?
well if its true.. all i can say is that the marriage must have been in a very poor state to start with.
Funny!!!!
Lol, might want to phone her before it arrives.
Let her know that you care! In an on-line poll 87% wish she were her, too. Majority rules!
Lmao! If it's that letter then yes. Love it!
Nice one. What did the wife say?
yeah, that's probably the worst thing that could be sent.
LOL! As long as it was addressed to the right person you should be fine.
Now that's funny. I could see how that may offend her.
Quit writing postcards or Emails. Just ring her next time.
OMG-ur getting ur a$$ kicked!!
Least you didn't send it to yo mama.
No...and if she does get upset just lose the louse.
LOL
Oh dear...unlucky, but funny
Yes, I'd say that might be the beginning of an end to something
only if the picture on the front of the card was a sheep
I doubt it.
I think u b screwed !!
LMAO thats a funny one to remember
it can if you added the wrong name
lol
LMAO...indeed that would raise my suspicions
Ouch....I'd wear a cup if I were you.Can forgetting one letter in a word ruin a marriage? While on a business holiday I sent my wife a postcard?
i guess it depends on the girl. i would hope your relationship is stronger then that.
for me, i wouldn't take that personally, cause my fiance writes fast, sloppy, and has a tendency to forget letters. so i wouldn't think anything of it.
did she say something about it? if she trusts you, she shouldn't be worrying about it...
good luck!
Well maybe next time you write, instead of a postcard you can send her a letter. Get it? Send her the missing ';e';? Thank you. Good night!
Very Freudian. Bet your wife isn't laughing. Better send a floral arrangement with a note on the card, ';Oops, looks like I missed a vowel in my last postcard, and I'm still missing ';U';! ';
Nice work! If your wife is the jealous type you might be screwed for awhile. If your wife is self assured in your relationship she just might get over it. She may never let you forget it though.
an innocent oversight dude ...don;t fold under pressure,could scar the relationship for life,,lol
LOL. Business holiday?!?
well if its true.. all i can say is that the marriage must have been in a very poor state to start with.
Funny!!!!
Lol, might want to phone her before it arrives.
Let her know that you care! In an on-line poll 87% wish she were her, too. Majority rules!
Lmao! If it's that letter then yes. Love it!
Nice one. What did the wife say?
yeah, that's probably the worst thing that could be sent.
LOL! As long as it was addressed to the right person you should be fine.
Now that's funny. I could see how that may offend her.
Quit writing postcards or Emails. Just ring her next time.
OMG-ur getting ur a$$ kicked!!
Least you didn't send it to yo mama.
No...and if she does get upset just lose the louse.
LOL
Oh dear...unlucky, but funny
Yes, I'd say that might be the beginning of an end to something
only if the picture on the front of the card was a sheep
I doubt it.
I think u b screwed !!
LMAO thats a funny one to remember
it can if you added the wrong name
lol
LMAO...indeed that would raise my suspicions
Is an emotional affair just as detrimental to a marriage as a physical one?
Why or Why not?Is an emotional affair just as detrimental to a marriage as a physical one?
It is much more dangerous for a marriage should your spouse connect with someone emotionally than physically. Anyone who finds himself or herself drawn to another person on an emotional level should consider the possible consequences of such an affair. Emotional affairs are just as likely to lead to divorce and physical affairs.Is an emotional affair just as detrimental to a marriage as a physical one?
An emotional affair involves much more than just body parts, it involves your actual feelings and how you want to spend your time %26amp; who with. MUCH more detrimental. I have never had an issue when my lady was with another guy as long as it was just sex. When she started caring about his feelings or worrying she had upset him is when I sat her down and made her discuss who she wants to be with.
I think a physical affair is worse because it introduces the possibility of STDs and babies. Emotions come, and emotions go... For example, angry words can be exchanged in a fight, but as time passes the emotions fade. Emotions can be overcome. But the remnants of a physical affair have the potential to be life-lasting.
Yes, because such a fine line exists between emotional and physical affairs. I feel like at the emotional level is where the actual conscious decision is made to ';love'; or be with someone else. If your other is willing and ready to be with someone else then as soon as the opportunity presents itself it will morph into a physical relationship. emotional cheating is the first step in my opinion.
At least if not more. Some people can just have sex just for the sake of sex. That is a betrayal of fidelity. But an emotional affair is falling in love with someone else. That belittles the love and commitment you have/or had with the one your cheating on.
Yes - Absolutely - when you engage the emotions you engage the heart, when you engage th heart, you change the world.
you can never go back, ever...you must live anew
I think an emotional affair is worse then a physical affair because your feelings and heart are more involved.
Anything associated with an affair is detrimental to a marriage. Its still betrayal.
An affair is an affair. It doesn't need a sub category........ sheezeeeee.....
It is much more dangerous for a marriage should your spouse connect with someone emotionally than physically. Anyone who finds himself or herself drawn to another person on an emotional level should consider the possible consequences of such an affair. Emotional affairs are just as likely to lead to divorce and physical affairs.Is an emotional affair just as detrimental to a marriage as a physical one?
An emotional affair involves much more than just body parts, it involves your actual feelings and how you want to spend your time %26amp; who with. MUCH more detrimental. I have never had an issue when my lady was with another guy as long as it was just sex. When she started caring about his feelings or worrying she had upset him is when I sat her down and made her discuss who she wants to be with.
I think a physical affair is worse because it introduces the possibility of STDs and babies. Emotions come, and emotions go... For example, angry words can be exchanged in a fight, but as time passes the emotions fade. Emotions can be overcome. But the remnants of a physical affair have the potential to be life-lasting.
Yes, because such a fine line exists between emotional and physical affairs. I feel like at the emotional level is where the actual conscious decision is made to ';love'; or be with someone else. If your other is willing and ready to be with someone else then as soon as the opportunity presents itself it will morph into a physical relationship. emotional cheating is the first step in my opinion.
At least if not more. Some people can just have sex just for the sake of sex. That is a betrayal of fidelity. But an emotional affair is falling in love with someone else. That belittles the love and commitment you have/or had with the one your cheating on.
Yes - Absolutely - when you engage the emotions you engage the heart, when you engage th heart, you change the world.
you can never go back, ever...you must live anew
I think an emotional affair is worse then a physical affair because your feelings and heart are more involved.
Anything associated with an affair is detrimental to a marriage. Its still betrayal.
An affair is an affair. It doesn't need a sub category........ sheezeeeee.....
In a marriage, how can couple enjoy explorrative fun?
In a marriage, how can couple enjoy explorrative fun? Is it ok if both understand the need to extend themselves for other partners just for sex (Specially with close friends).
How many of you have experienced swap with close friends and how u rate it?In a marriage, how can couple enjoy explorrative fun?
There are more ways to spice up the sex life then bringing other parties to the bedroom.
Ask each other what your sexual fantasies are (other then an open marriage). Each couple should accommodate the others fantasies.
It can spice things up without ruining the marriage.In a marriage, how can couple enjoy explorrative fun?
People can be so judgemental.
If both partners really want a 3sum then it's fine and can be a lot of fun. We did it quite often but it was years ago as we now have a child and it is impractical.
There is always a bit issue about finding someone suitable but it can be done.
The last time we had a 3sum was about 15 years ago and, although, I haven't really missed it and have a magical sex life, they were adventures.
Marriage means one man one woman
what you say is not marriage, but Orgy and Orgy means end of marriage
Your privacy your self respect and your warmth and love are gone and gone for ever.
If you want to ruin your marriage and future happiness, indulge in such imaginary explorative fun, a better name for Orgy
Bringing in a 3rd party (live or porn) is not a good idea. It will eventually kill the marriage/relationship. Why would you even consider having sex with another person? What part of the marriage vows did you not understand or care about?
How many of you have experienced swap with close friends and how u rate it?In a marriage, how can couple enjoy explorrative fun?
There are more ways to spice up the sex life then bringing other parties to the bedroom.
Ask each other what your sexual fantasies are (other then an open marriage). Each couple should accommodate the others fantasies.
It can spice things up without ruining the marriage.In a marriage, how can couple enjoy explorrative fun?
People can be so judgemental.
If both partners really want a 3sum then it's fine and can be a lot of fun. We did it quite often but it was years ago as we now have a child and it is impractical.
There is always a bit issue about finding someone suitable but it can be done.
The last time we had a 3sum was about 15 years ago and, although, I haven't really missed it and have a magical sex life, they were adventures.
Marriage means one man one woman
what you say is not marriage, but Orgy and Orgy means end of marriage
Your privacy your self respect and your warmth and love are gone and gone for ever.
If you want to ruin your marriage and future happiness, indulge in such imaginary explorative fun, a better name for Orgy
Bringing in a 3rd party (live or porn) is not a good idea. It will eventually kill the marriage/relationship. Why would you even consider having sex with another person? What part of the marriage vows did you not understand or care about?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)