Thursday, May 13, 2010

If Republicans really believe that a marriage should be between a man & a woman,where does the mistress fit in?

Or is that OK, since the mistress is not technically part of the ';marriage';?If Republicans really believe that a marriage should be between a man %26amp; a woman,where does the mistress fit in?
This is rarely a problem, since most Republicans cheat with other men or boys.If Republicans really believe that a marriage should be between a man %26amp; a woman,where does the mistress fit in?
Hey, John Milton, while you're at it, check with McCain. He left his wife and married his mistress, so I guess that's ok.





The biggest threat to marriage is the easily obtained divorce and the unwillingness to work through rough spots. So how about all of you people working so hard against gay marriage start putting some of that time and money into counseling services.





I didn't know you were there for that divorce. Leaving the mother of his children, who stood by him while he was a POW, who was disfigured in an accident, for a young rich woman. HMMM I bet she was just thrilled.
I'm a Libertarian and I don't grasp the concept of a mistress.





Just biologically speaking, the woman climaxes multiple times, the man once and then there's a few hours off. I'm in very good shape and it's all I can do to keep up with my GF (granted she's in extremely good shape and 6 years younger). IDK how these guys in their 50s and 60s who aren't in shape manage to keep the wife AND a mistress occupied. If the answer is that they're not keeping the wife occupied then why don't they just get divorced?
I like the mistress that is under the oval office desk. Better yet the mistress who takes the place of the wife with cancer. Personal indescrections by slime balls by either party has nothing to do with gay marriage the only connectionis both destroy family values and an assualt on marriage
Marriage is thru the church and adultery is considered a sin...





Why cannot we call ALL Marriages outside of the church be called Civil Unions and within the church Marriage?





That would solve pretty much everything I think... Then all the lil cry babies can stop their belly ackin and feel that they are equal again even though they already are.





Then we can focus on polygamy and bestiality next!!!
Well, if you are a Kennedy the mistress either ';accidentally'; OD's in the bathtub or you push her off the bridge in your car. The cousin Skackel used a golf club didnt he and the other cousin (smith i think) didnt he have like 3 or 4 rapes?





Hell, Clinton was accused of 2 rapes, sexual harassment with Paula and having sex with an employee Monica and Democrats yelled it's just sex.





Not sure which party has more affairs but it does seem that democrats have much more abuse and deaths of women on their hands.





Maybe we should embrace the Muslims as Obama wants......no more gays and no more mistresses, you just keep marrying more and more wives, some at age 10 even.
Mistress is such a Democrat concept. Everyone knows Republicans bang their secretaries, maids, house keeper and nannies. The idea of having a relationship where money does not exchange hands is just so pedestrian.
It's not only Republicans who are saying this sweetness, liberals are as well. Prop 8 banning gay marriage was passed in a dark blue liberal state right after voting percentage wise more for Obama than any other state in the country. God bless.
No, we should legalize polygamy right along with gay marriage. Then the second wife would have equal protection under the law.
she fits in between the wife and the head board or visa versa we can find better things to do with a mistress than introduce her to cigars like the demos great leader.
According to BJ Clinton, the mistress fits under the desk.
Since you want to be married to a women so bad, do you mind if I marry my wife and mistress?
I thought that was obvious - between 'Mister' and 'Mattress'.
Doesn't the mistress come with the house like a refrigerator does?
As a humidor for clinton.
';Concubinage'; is supported in the Bible...(just don't tell the misses)...
Yeah, if you married her, she wouldn't be a mistress.
The Bible says pretty much anything between 1 man and any number of women is OK.
Whats being a Republican got to do with, sexual perversion?
She fits in right next to the divorce lawyer.
holidays and weekends
Well I haven't found out where you fit in yet so I'll get back to you.
My pants. Muahahahaha!


*Ahem*





:)
He just has sex with the mistress... but he looooves his wife.
The more the merrier.
Let me check with John Edwards, D-NC %26amp; I'll get back with you.
are we speaking from experience deary? sounds like lesbo action to me!

No comments:

Post a Comment